Idea Statica
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company
  • Steel overview
  • Connection design
  • Member design
  • Parametric design
  • Steel case studies
  • Concrete overview
  • Walls and D-regions
  • Anchoring design
  • Concrete case studies
  • BIM Overview
  • Supported integrations
  • Checkbot
  • Viewer
  • APIs
  • Support Center
  • E-learning & certification
  • Blog
  • Downloads & Licensing
  • Plans
  • Free community tool
  • Enterprise customers
  • Students & educators
  • How much will you save?
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Research & development
  • Authorized resellers
  • Meet our customers
  • Career
  • Steel
    Steel overviewConnection designMember designParametric designSteel case studies
  • Concrete
    Concrete overviewWalls and D-regionsAnchoring designConcrete case studies
  • BIM & Workflows
    BIM OverviewSupported integrationsCheckbotViewerAPIs
  • Support & Learning
    Support CenterE-learning & certificationBlogDownloads & Licensing
  • Pricing
    PlansFree community toolEnterprise customersStudents & educatorsHow much will you save?
  • Company
    About usContactResearch & developmentAuthorized resellersMeet our customersCareer
14-Day Trial
14-Day Trial
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company

Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

  • About us
  • Partners
  • Careers
  • Patent

Resources

  • Customer projects
  • Case studies
  • Connection Library
  • Verification books

Legal

  • EULA
  • Privacy policy
  • California Privacy
  • TOS Viewer
  • Licensing

Help

  • Contact
  • Quote request
  • Resellers
  • Downloads
FacebookInstagramLinkedInYouTube

Ā© IDEA StatiCa 2009-2026

Trusted and used worldwide by engineers, fabricators & consultants.

Support CenterKnowledge Base Articles2.7 Solution method and load-control algorithm
2.7 Solution method and load-control algorithm
ConcreteKnowledge baseDetail 2DACI (USA)EN (Eurocode)

2.7 Solution method and load-control algorithm

This article is also available in
ENCZDEESFRITPTNLHUROKRPLTHTRVIZH

A standard full Newton-Raphson (NR) algorithm is used to find the solution to a non-linear FEM problem.Ā 

Generally, the NR algorithm does not often converge when the full load is applied in a single step. A usual approach, which is also used here, is to apply the load sequentially in multiple increments and use the result from the previous load increment to start the Newton solution of a subsequent one. For this purpose, a load control algorithm was implemented on top of the Newton-Raphson. In the case that the NR iterations do not converge, the current load increment is reduced to half its value, and the NR iterations are retried.

A second purpose of the load-control algorithm is to find the critical load, which corresponds to certain ā€œstop criteriaā€ – specifically the maximum strain in concrete, the maximum slip in bond elements, the maximum displacement in anchorage elements, and the maximum strain in reinforcing bars. The critical load is found using the bisection method. In the case that the stop criterion is exceeded anywhere in the model, the results of the last load increment are discarded, and a new increment of half the size of the previous one is calculated. This process is repeated until the critical load is found with a certain error tolerance.

For concrete, the stop criterion was set to a 5% strain in compression (i.e., around an order of magnitude larger than the actual failure strain of concrete) and 7% in tension at the integration points of shell elements. In tension, the value was set to allow for the limit strain in reinforcement, which is usually around 5% without accounting for tension stiffening, to be reached first. In compression, the value was chosen from among several alternatives as one that is large enough for the effects of crushing to be visible in the results, but small enough so as not to cause too many problems with numerical stability.

Fig. 21	 Constitutive relationship of bond and anchorage elements used for anchorage length verification: (a) bond shear stress slip response of a bond element; (b) force-displacement response of an anchorage element.

Fig.Ā 17ConstitutiveĀ relationshipĀ ofĀ bondĀ andĀ anchorageĀ elementsĀ usedĀ forĀ anchorageĀ lengthĀ verification:\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 17\qquad Constitutive relationship of bond and anchorage elements used for anchorage length verification:}}}Fig.Ā 17ConstitutiveĀ relationshipĀ ofĀ bondĀ andĀ anchorageĀ elementsĀ usedĀ forĀ anchorageĀ lengthĀ verification:

(a)Ā bondĀ shearĀ stressĀ slipĀ responseĀ ofĀ aĀ bondĀ element;Ā (b)Ā force-displacementĀ responseĀ ofĀ anĀ anchorageĀ element.\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{(a) bond shear stress slip response of a bond element; (b) force-displacement response of an anchorage element.}}}(a)Ā bondĀ shearĀ stressĀ slipĀ responseĀ ofĀ aĀ bondĀ element;Ā (b)Ā force-displacementĀ responseĀ ofĀ anĀ anchorageĀ element.

For reinforcement, the stop criterion is defined in terms of stresses. Since stresses at the crack are modeled, the criterion in tension corresponds to the reinforcement tensile strength accounting for the safety coefficient. The same value is used for the criterion in compression.

The stop criterion in bond elements and anchorage springs is α·Γumax, where Γumax is the maximal slip used in code checks and α = 10.

Related articles

Solution for walls and details of concrete structures
  • Concrete
  • Detail 2D
  • EN (Eurocode)
  • CSFM
  • SLS
  • Wall
  • ACI (USA)
  • +7
  • Concrete
  • Detail 2D
  • EN (Eurocode)
  • CSFM
  • SLS
  • Wall
  • ACI (USA)

Verifications

Solution for walls and details of concrete structures

Read more
Fire resistance check of concrete structures
  • Concrete
  • EN (Eurocode)
  • RCS
  • Fire resistance
  • +4
  • Concrete
  • EN (Eurocode)
  • RCS
  • Fire resistance

Webinar

Fire resistance check of concrete structures

Read more