Idea Statica
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company
  • Steel overview
  • Connection design
  • Member design
  • Parametric design
  • Steel case studies
  • Concrete overview
  • Walls and D-regions
  • Anchoring design
  • Concrete case studies
  • BIM Overview
  • Supported integrations
  • Checkbot
  • Viewer
  • APIs
  • Support Center
  • E-learning & certification
  • Blog
  • Downloads & Licensing
  • Plans
  • Free community tool
  • Enterprise customers
  • Students & educators
  • How much will you save?
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Research & development
  • Authorized resellers
  • Meet our customers
  • Career
  • Steel
    Steel overviewConnection designMember designParametric designSteel case studies
  • Concrete
    Concrete overviewWalls and D-regionsAnchoring designConcrete case studies
  • BIM & Workflows
    BIM OverviewSupported integrationsCheckbotViewerAPIs
  • Support & Learning
    Support CenterE-learning & certificationBlogDownloads & Licensing
  • Pricing
    PlansFree community toolEnterprise customersStudents & educatorsHow much will you save?
  • Company
    About usContactResearch & developmentAuthorized resellersMeet our customersCareer
14-Day Trial
14-Day Trial
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company

Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

  • About us
  • Partners
  • Careers
  • Patent

Resources

  • Customer projects
  • Case studies
  • Connection Library
  • Verification books

Legal

  • EULA
  • Privacy policy
  • California Privacy
  • TOS Viewer
  • Licensing

Help

  • Contact
  • Quote request
  • Resellers
  • Downloads
FacebookInstagramLinkedInYouTube

© IDEA StatiCa 2009-2026

Trusted and used worldwide by engineers, fabricators & consultants.

Support CenterKnowledge Base ArticlesCapacity design according to Russian standards
Advanced analysis types for your steel structures
Seismic analysis in IDEA StatiCa Connection
Qualification checks of seismic prequalified connections for AISC
Prequalified Steel Connections (AISC) - Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations
Steel connection capacity design
Capacity design (EN)
Capacity design (AISC)
Capacity design according to Canadian standards
Capacity design according to Australian standards
Capacity design according to Indian Standard
Capacity design according to Hong Kong Code
Capacity design according to Chinese standard
Capacity design according to Russian standards
Capacity design is using the same procedure as in EC due to missing prescriptions in Russian codes. IDEA StatiCa - engineering software for the structural design of steel connections and beams.
SteelKnowledge baseConnectionSP 16 (Russia)

Capacity design according to Russian standards

This article is also available in
ENCZDEESFRITPTNLHUROKRPLTHTRVIZH

Capacity design is using the same procedure as in EC due to missing prescriptions in Russian codes.

The objective of capacity design is to confirm a building undergoes controlled ductile behaviour in order to avoid collapse in a design-level earthquake. Plastic hinge is expected to appear in dissipative item and all non-dissipative items of the joint must be able to safely transfer forces due to the yielding in the dissipative item. The dissipative item is usually a beam in moment resisting frame but it may also be e.g. an end plate. The service factor is not used for dissipative items. Two factors are assigned to the dissipative item:

  • γov – overstrength factor – EN 1998-1, Cl. 6.2; the recommended value is γov = 1.25; editable in materials
  • γsh – strain-hardening factor; the recommended values are γsh = 1.2 for beam in moment resisting frame, γsh = 1.0 otherwise; editable in operation

The material diagram is modified according to the following figure:

The objective of capacity design is to confirm a building undergoes controlled ductile behavior in order to avoid a collapse in a design-level earthquake. Structural design of welded and bolted connections.

The increased strength of the dissipative item allows for the input of loads that cause the plastic hinge to appear in dissipative item. In the case of moment resisting frame and beam as the dissipative item, the beam should be loaded by My,Ed = γovγshfyWpl,y and corresponding shear forceVz,Ed = –2 My,Ed / Lh, where:

  • fy – characteristic yield strength
  • Wpl,y – plastic section modulus
  • Lh – distance between plastic hinges on the beam

In case of asymmetric joint, the beam should be loaded by both sagging and hogging bending moments and their corresponding shear forces.

The plates of dissipative items are excluded from check.

Related articles

CBFEM method combines the advantages of the general Finite Element Method and standard Component Method. Structural design of welded and bolted steel connections and steel beam to column connection details.
  • Steel
  • SP 16 (Russia)
  • CBFEM
  • Connection
  • +4
  • Steel
  • SP 16 (Russia)
  • CBFEM
  • Connection

Theoretical background

Check of steel connection components (SP)

Read more
The joints are classified according to rotational stiffness to rigid, semi-rigid, and pinned. The stiffness in the model should conform to the real joint stiffness. IDEA StatiCa - structural design of welded and bolted steel connections.
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • CBFEM
  • Rotational stiffness
  • Stiffness
  • SP 16 (Russia)
  • +6
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • CBFEM
  • Rotational stiffness
  • Stiffness
  • SP 16 (Russia)

Knowledge base

Joint classification according to Russian standards

Read more
Capacity design analysis to deal with seismics
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • AISC (USA)
  • CBFEM
  • Capacity design
  • Moment Connection
  • Seismicity
  • EN (Eurocode)
  • +8
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • AISC (USA)
  • CBFEM
  • Capacity design
  • Moment Connection
  • Seismicity
  • EN (Eurocode)

Knowledge base

Seismic analysis in IDEA StatiCa Connection

Read more