Description
This study is focused on the verification of component-based finite element method (CBFEM) for the resistance of the symmetrical double splice slip-resistant connection to an analytical model (AM).
Analytical model
The slip resistance of a preloaded bolt is designed according to chapter 3.9.1 in EN 1993-1-8:2005. The preloading force is taken at 70 % of the ultimate strength of a bolt according to equation (3.7).
Verification of resistance
Design resistances calculated by CBFEM are compared with the results of analytical model (AM); see (Wald et al. 2018). The results are summarized in Tab. 5.5.1. The parameter is bolt diameter; see Fig. 5.5.1.

Tab. 5.5.1 Comparison of bolt resistance predicted by FE model to analytical one for bolt diameter; joint: splice 200/12 mm, bolts 2 Ă— MĂ— 8.8, plates 2 Ă— 200/20 mm, steel S235
| Parameter | Â | Analytical Model (AM) | CBFEM | Â | AM/ CBFEM | |
| Diam. | Distances | Resist. [kN] | Critical component | Resist. [kN] | Critical component | Â |
| M16 | p = 55 e1Â =Â 40 | 211 | Slip | 205 | Slip | 1,03 |
| M20 | p = 70 e1=Â 50 | 329 | Slip | 320 | Slip | 1,03 |
| M24 | p = 80 e1Â =Â 60 | 474 | Slip | 463 | Slip | 1,02 |
| M27 | p = 90 e1Â =Â 70 | 617 | Slip | 596 | Slip | 1,04 |
| M30 | p = 100 e1 =Â 75 | 754 | Slip | 728 | Slip | 1,04 |

The results of sensitivity studies are summarized in the graph in Fig. 5.5.2. The results show that the differences between the two calculation methods are below 5Â %. Analytical model gives generally higher resistance.

Benchmark example
Inputs
Connected member
- Steel S235
- Splice 200Ă—12 mm
Connectors
Bolts
- 3 Ă— M20 8.8
- Distances e1 = 50 mm, p = 70 mm
Two splices
- Steel S235
- Plate 480Ă—200Ă—20 mm
Code setup
- Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.5
Outputs
- Design resistance FRd = 320 kN
- Design failure mode is slip of the bolts

