Idea Statica
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company
  • Steel overview
  • Connection design
  • Member design
  • Parametric design
  • Steel case studies
  • Concrete overview
  • Walls and D-regions
  • Anchoring design
  • Concrete case studies
  • BIM Overview
  • Supported integrations
  • Checkbot
  • Viewer
  • APIs
  • Support Center
  • E-learning & certification
  • Blog
  • Downloads & Licensing
  • Plans
  • Free community tool
  • Enterprise customers
  • Students & educators
  • How much will you save?
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Research & development
  • Authorized resellers
  • Meet our customers
  • Career
  • Steel
    Steel overviewConnection designMember designParametric designSteel case studies
  • Concrete
    Concrete overviewWalls and D-regionsAnchoring designConcrete case studies
  • BIM & Workflows
    BIM OverviewSupported integrationsCheckbotViewerAPIs
  • Support & Learning
    Support CenterE-learning & certificationBlogDownloads & Licensing
  • Pricing
    PlansFree community toolEnterprise customersStudents & educatorsHow much will you save?
  • Company
    About usContactResearch & developmentAuthorized resellersMeet our customersCareer
14-Day Trial
14-Day Trial
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & Workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company

Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

  • About us
  • Partners
  • Careers
  • Patent

Resources

  • Customer projects
  • Case studies
  • Connection Library
  • Verification books

Legal

  • EULA
  • Privacy policy
  • California Privacy
  • TOS Viewer
  • Licensing

Help

  • Contact
  • Quote request
  • Resellers
  • Downloads
FacebookInstagramLinkedInYouTube

© IDEA StatiCa 2009-2026

Trusted and used worldwide by engineers, fabricators & consultants.

Support CenterVerification examplesSplices in shear in slip-resistant connection
Splices in shear in slip-resistant connection
SteelVerificationsEN (Eurocode)CBFEMBolts

Splices in shear in slip-resistant connection

This article is also available in
ENCZDEESFRITPTNLHUROKRPLTHTRVIZH

This is a selected chapter from book Component-based finite element design of steel connections by prof. Wald et al. The chapter is focused on verification of preloaded bolts.

Description

This study is focused on the verification of component-based finite element method (CBFEM) for the resistance of the symmetrical double splice slip-resistant connection to an analytical model (AM).

Analytical model

The slip resistance of a preloaded bolt is designed according to chapter 3.9.1 in EN 1993-1-8:2005. The preloading force is taken at 70 % of the ultimate strength of a bolt according to equation (3.7).

Verification of resistance

Design resistances calculated by CBFEM are compared with the results of analytical model (AM); see (Wald et al. 2018). The results are summarized in Tab. 5.5.1. The parameter is bolt diameter; see Fig. 5.5.1.

Drawing 5.5.1 Joint geometry and dimensions\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Drawing 5.5.1 Joint geometry and dimensions}}}Drawing 5.5.1 Joint geometry and dimensions

Tab. 5.5.1 Comparison of bolt resistance predicted by FE model to analytical one for bolt diameter; joint: splice 200/12 mm, bolts 2 Ă— MĂ— 8.8, plates 2 Ă— 200/20 mm, steel S235

Parameter Analytical Model (AM)CBFEM AM/ CBFEM
Diam.DistancesResist. [kN]Critical componentResist. [kN]Critical component 
M16p = 55 e1 = 40211Slip205Slip1,03
M20p = 70 e1= 50329Slip320Slip1,03
M24p = 80 e1 = 60474Slip463Slip1,02
M27p = 90 e1 = 70617Slip596Slip1,04
M30p = 100 e1 = 75754Slip728Slip1,04

Fig. 5.5.1 Sensitivity study for the bolt diameter\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 5.5.1 Sensitivity study for the bolt diameter}}}Fig. 5.5.1 Sensitivity study for the bolt diameter

The results of sensitivity studies are summarized in the graph in Fig. 5.5.2. The results show that the differences between the two calculation methods are below 5 %. Analytical model gives generally higher resistance.

Fig. 5.5.2 Verification of CBFEM to AM for the slip-resistant double splice connection\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 5.5.2 Verification of CBFEM to AM for the slip-resistant double splice connection}}}Fig. 5.5.2 Verification of CBFEM to AM for the slip-resistant double splice connection

Benchmark example

Inputs

Connected member

  • Steel S235
  • Splice 200Ă—12 mm

Connectors

Bolts

  • 3 Ă— M20 8.8
  • Distances e1 = 50 mm, p = 70 mm

Two splices

  • Steel S235
  • Plate 480Ă—200Ă—20 mm

Code setup

  • Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.5

Outputs

  • Design resistance FRd = 320 kN
  • Design failure mode is slip of the bolts

Fig. 5.5.3 Benchmark example of the bolted splices in shear\textsf{\textit{\footnotesize{Fig. 5.5.3 Benchmark example of the bolted splices in shear}}}Fig. 5.5.3 Benchmark example of the bolted splices in shear

Open in ViewerDownload